<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>FeVote - Projects without "next actions"</title>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <description>Make suggestions, vote on suggestions</description>
    <link>http://www.fevote.com//Projects_without_next_actions</link>
	
    <item>
      <title>By: krewetka</title>
      <description><![CDATA[One small remark to : "think marking project with 0 - actions in red is a good way to make those projects stand out. Will work on it."  I hope you ... ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.fevote.com/simplegtd/Projects_without_next_actions#comment-597</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:35:27 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By: bkhl</title>
      <description><![CDATA[I agree that this would be useful.  How this should be implemented depends on how you view projects.  One way would be to just make it easier to r... ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.fevote.com/simplegtd/Projects_without_next_actions#comment-532</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:21:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By: merante</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Well, if I understand GTD, really the only thing we identify is the "next action" for a project.  Once we complete that "next action", we re-evaluate ... ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.fevote.com/simplegtd/Projects_without_next_actions#comment-343</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>By: fviereck</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Projects w/o Next Action? How does this work with GTD?... ]]></description>
      <link>http://www.fevote.com/simplegtd/Projects_without_next_actions#comment-342</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:00:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>